Hopefully thought-provoking? My keynote on “Personal Data in a Digital World: What Are We Protecting?” kicked off the Nordic Privacy & Innovation Summit 2025 today in Stockholm. Among my topics: SRB, OT, ePrivacy, AI and AI model training, plus how to make the GDPR more workable (see slides, which show that data protection involves a balance and that we have to be wary of absolutism).
A topic I haven’t yet written much about is that of special categories of data (SCDs).
The idea behind the EU Court of Justice’s OT judgment (1 Aug 2022) sounds logical: if a spouse’s name can reveal sexual preference, shouldn’t it be treated as an SCD under Art. 9(1) GDPR?
However, this approach is unworkable. Tampon purchases can reveal that a woman isn’t pregnant. Combine OT with the Lindenapotheke case (“over-the-counter drug sales reveal health data about the purchaser, even if the medication isn’t intended for him/her”), and a simple supermarket ticket suddenly involves the processing of SCDs (!). It doesn’t make sense for Art. 9 to apply though in such a case.
Based on the leaked Digital Omnibus draft, some at the Commission clearly understand that for the SCD provisions to be workable, *they must only apply to actual inferences* – not hypothetical or indirect ones. Hence information that “directly” reveals e.g. health status. Some have claimed this is a blank cheque for GDPR violations, but the truth is that without this, *everything* is potentially an SCD, because much could theoretically be inferred even if incorrect (“video surveillance = racial data”; “employee absence = health data”; “lunch choice = health data”; “opinion = political affiliation”; etc.).
Kudos to (some at) the EC. Let’s hope this idea survives lobbying attempts to consecrate absolutism!
Further reading:
– Mikołaj Barczentewicz’s piece on the Digital Omnibus: https://lnkd.in/eqeFvYH5
– Dr M.R. (Mark) Leiser’s in-depth analysis and rebuttal of the NOYB/EDRi/ICCL talking points on the Digital Omnibus: https://lnkd.in/enYaFc2u
– My summary of the draft: https://lnkd.in/ec7aBC2A
Did this analysis get you thinking? Reach out!
DataLaws.net is entirely open-access, and instead of getting your data in exchange for this content, how about another trade? If this commentary saved you research time or sparked an idea, feel free to invite me over for tea, chai or a hot chocolate next time you are around Brussels or Antwerp - or invite me over to your offices for a chat!
Get in touch ↗ Let's connect on LinkedIn ↗